lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17f53f72-9fd9-4cf0-b925-8ca3e9b02792@pankajraghav.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 16:06:15 +0200
From: Pankaj Raghav <kernel@...kajraghav.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, mcgrof@...nel.org,
 Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@....de,
 linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
 gost.dev@...sung.com, Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: reject bs > ps block devices when THP is
 disabled


On 7/4/25 14:47, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 11:50:36AM +0200, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Use mapping_max_folio_size_supported() instead of doing a ifdef with
>>   CONFIG_THP
> 
> why?  v1 looked better to me

Oh really? I am fine with anything but I thought this looks better instead
having an ifdef.

--
Pankaj

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ