[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <175164333073.1188085.16117765198083829346.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 18:44:10 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@...roid.com,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev@....com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Filter out SME hwcaps when FEAT_SME isn't implemented
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 12:28:48 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> We have a number of hwcaps for various SME subfeatures enumerated via
> ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1. Currently we advertise these without cross checking
> against the main SME feature, advertised in ID_AA64PFR1_EL1.SME which
> means that if the two are out of sync userspace can see a confusing
> situation where SME subfeatures are advertised without the base SME
> hwcap. This can be readily triggered by using the arm64.nosme override
> which only masks out ID_AA64PFR1_EL1.SME, and there have also been
> reports of VMMs which do the same thing.
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
[1/1] arm64: Filter out SME hwcaps when FEAT_SME isn't implemented
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/a75ad2fc76a2
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists