[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGgdelD0srH8twNN@cassiopeiae>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 20:29:14 +0200
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] rust: pci: add irq accessors
On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 04:30:04PM -0300, Daniel Almeida wrote:
> + /// Returns an [`IrqRequest`] for the IRQ vector at the given index, if any.
> + pub fn request_irq_by_index(&self, index: u32) -> Result<IrqRequest<'_>> {
Same comment as for platform:
Please name the functions returning an IrqRequest without the 'request' prefix.
And instead put the 'request' prefix in front of the methods that return a
actual irq::Registration.
Besides that, I think we shouldn't name this method 'by_index'. Please align it
with the C function, i.e. Device::irq_vector().
> + pub fn irq_by_index<T: crate::irq::Handler + 'static>(
I'd go with just request_irq() for this one and
> + pub fn threaded_irq_by_index<T: crate::irq::ThreadedHandler + 'static>(
request_threaded_irq() for this one.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists