linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250704162817.14314a06@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 16:28:17 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, Networking
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:

  kernel/time/timekeeping.c

between commit:

  5b605dbee07d ("timekeeping: Provide ktime_get_clock_ts64()")

from the net-next tree and commit:

  22c62b9a84b8 ("timekeeping: Introduce auxiliary timekeepers")

from the tip tree.

I fixed it up (the latter just removed a blank line where the former added
a new function :-( ) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped