[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250704075443.3221370-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 10:54:43 +0300
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 56/80] pwm: img: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(),
pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call
to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy().
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
---
The cover letter of the set can be found here
<URL:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250704075225.3212486-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>.
In brief, this patch depends on PM runtime patches adding marking the last
busy timestamp in autosuspend related functions. The patches are here, on
rc2:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \
pm-runtime-6.17-rc1
drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
index 71542956feca..91e0b19f0c08 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
@@ -139,7 +139,6 @@ static int img_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
(timebase << PWM_CH_CFG_TMBASE_SHIFT);
img_pwm_writel(imgchip, PWM_CH_CFG(pwm->hwpwm), val);
- pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(pwmchip_parent(chip));
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(pwmchip_parent(chip));
return 0;
@@ -175,7 +174,6 @@ static void img_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
val &= ~BIT(pwm->hwpwm);
img_pwm_writel(imgchip, PWM_CTRL_CFG, val);
- pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(pwmchip_parent(chip));
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(pwmchip_parent(chip));
}
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists