linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the i2c-host tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250704123601.52101f49@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 12:36:01 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@...o.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the i2c-host tree

Hi Qianfeng,

On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 10:16:08 +0800 Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@...o.com> wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, I made a mistake,  can anyone help to roll back this patch?
> But I want to ask if it's because I didn't compile with W=1 and
> didn't find this compilation error locally？ Anyway, I will learn
> from this lesson and be more careful in subsequent submissions.

I just did an arm multi_v7_defconfig build.  Building this file depends
on CONFIG_I2C_ST which in turn depend on ARCH_STI || COMPILE_TEST.  I
don't use W=1.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped