[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH4c4j+Hz8HNzxZhe0DzDAN8vUS3vGN+SL1iMJuXL29AnmQ0cg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 15:22:33 +0530
From: Pranav Tyagi <pranav.tyagi03@...il.com>
To: Carlos Maiolino <cem@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, djwong@...nel.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/xfs: replace strncpy with memtostr_pad()
On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 2:22 PM Carlos Maiolino <cem@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 12:56:04PM +0530, Pranav Tyagi wrote:
> > Replace the deprecated strncpy() with memtostr_pad(). This also avoids
> > the need for separate zeroing using memset(). Mark sb_fname buffer with
> > __nonstring as its size is XFSLABEL_MAX and so no terminating NULL for
> > sb_fname.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pranav Tyagi <pranav.tyagi03@...il.com>
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202506300953.8b18c4e0-lkp@intel.com
>
> Hi Pranav.
>
> Please Read the kernel-test-robot email:
>
> "
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new
> version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags...
> "
>
> Those tags shouldn't be added here as you are not fixing anything, your
> previous patch have not been committed.
>
> Cheers,
> Carlos
>
Hi Carlos,
Thanks for the clarification. I was confused and thought that "separate
patch" referred to correcting the original one and resending it separately.
I’ll remove the tags and send a v2 shortly.
Regards
Pranav Tyagi
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h | 2 +-
> > fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 3 +--
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> > index 9566a7623365..779dac59b1f3 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> > @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_sb {
> > uint16_t sb_sectsize; /* volume sector size, bytes */
> > uint16_t sb_inodesize; /* inode size, bytes */
> > uint16_t sb_inopblock; /* inodes per block */
> > - char sb_fname[XFSLABEL_MAX]; /* file system name */
> > + char sb_fname[XFSLABEL_MAX] __nonstring; /* file system name */
> > uint8_t sb_blocklog; /* log2 of sb_blocksize */
> > uint8_t sb_sectlog; /* log2 of sb_sectsize */
> > uint8_t sb_inodelog; /* log2 of sb_inodesize */
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > index d250f7f74e3b..c3e8c5c1084f 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > @@ -990,9 +990,8 @@ xfs_ioc_getlabel(
> > BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(sbp->sb_fname) > FSLABEL_MAX);
> >
> > /* 1 larger than sb_fname, so this ensures a trailing NUL char */
> > - memset(label, 0, sizeof(label));
> > spin_lock(&mp->m_sb_lock);
> > - strncpy(label, sbp->sb_fname, XFSLABEL_MAX);
> > + memtostr_pad(label, sbp->sb_fname);
> > spin_unlock(&mp->m_sb_lock);
> >
> > if (copy_to_user(user_label, label, sizeof(label)))
> > --
> > 2.49.0
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists