lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DB36LGJOWHZQ.GHXR3VGX7806@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2025 11:59:40 +0200
From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>
To: "Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, "Danilo Krummrich"
 <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Alex Gaynor"
 <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>, "Gary Guo"
 <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
 <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Masahiro
 Yamada" <masahiroy@...nel.org>, "Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@...nel.org>,
 "Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@...nel.org>, "Nicolas Schier"
 <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>, "Adam
 Bratschi-Kaye" <ark.email@...il.com>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, "Petr
 Pavlu" <petr.pavlu@...e.com>, "Sami Tolvanen" <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
 "Daniel Gomez" <da.gomez@...sung.com>, "Simona Vetter"
 <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>, "Greg KH" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Fiona
 Behrens" <me@...enk.dev>, "Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
 <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 3/7] rust: introduce module_param module

On Fri Jul 4, 2025 at 9:37 AM CEST, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org> writes:
>
>> "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org> writes:
>>
>>> On 7/2/25 3:18 PM, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>>>> +    /// Get a shared reference to the parameter value.
>>>> +    // Note: When sysfs access to parameters are enabled, we have to pass in a
>>>> +    // held lock guard here.
>>>> +    pub fn get(&self) -> &T {
>>>> +        self.value.as_ref().unwrap_or(&self.default)
>>>> +    }
>>>
>>> I think you forgot to rename this.
>>
>> Yes, thanks for being persistent on this :)
>
> Actually, there is a discussion on whether to keep the API similar to
> `std::sync::OnceLock` [1] but also whether to rename this to something
> other than `OnceLock` [2]. Depending on how that resolves, it might make
> sense to stay with `get` or rename to something else.

But this is for the `ModuleParamAccess`, right? There I think it makes
sense to choose `access` or `value`.

---
Cheers,
Benno

> Best regards,
> Andreas Hindborg
>
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/35e1fef4-b715-4827-a498-bdde9b58b51c@penguintechs.org
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAH5fLggY2Ei14nVJzLBEoR1Rut1GKU4SZX=+14tuRH1aSuQVTA@mail.gmail.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ