[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250704113421.GNaGe8PbALdikAapIf@fat_crate.local>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 13:34:21 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
x86-cpuid@...ts.linux.dev, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/44] thermal: intel: Reorder headers alphabetically
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 01:39:42AM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> The source file uses cpuid_*() macros, but it does not include
> <asm/cpuid/api.h>. Sort its include lines so that the CPUID header can
> be included next.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@...utronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/intel/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Can we merge all those silly includes sorting patches into a single, per-topic
or per-tree patch respectively please?
A single includes sorting patch is fine too since the whole pile will go
through tip eventually.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists