linux-kernel - Re: [RFC V2 18/18] famfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aGh7qBzEJMFf_srS@archie.me>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 08:11:04 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, John Groves <John@...ves.net>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redb.hu>,
	Bernd Schubert <bschubert@....com>,
	John Groves <jgroves@...ron.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <shajnocz@...hat.com>,
	Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
	Aravind Ramesh <arramesh@...ron.com>,
	Ajay Joshi <ajayjoshi@...ron.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 18/18] famfs_fuse: Add documentation

On Sat, Jul 05, 2025 at 12:43:18AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2025 at 06:29:03AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > I'm looking for any Sphinx warnings, but if there's none, I check for
> > better wording or improving the docs output.
> 
> That's appreciated.  Really.  But what you should be looking for is
> unclear or misleading wording.  Not "this should be 'may' instead of
> 'might'".  The review you give is often closer to nitpicking than
> serious review.

Thanks for the tip!

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)