[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250705160129.3688026-5-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 18:01:11 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: ghennadi.procopciuc@....nxp.com,
S32@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/20] clocksource/drivers/vf_pit: Pass the cpu number as parameter
In order to initialize the timer with a cpumask tied to a cpu, let's
pass it as a parameter instead of hardwiring it in the init function.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
---
drivers/clocksource/timer-vf-pit.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-vf-pit.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-vf-pit.c
index 34edb23194c5..20f637c8e856 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-vf-pit.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-vf-pit.c
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pit_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
}
static int __init pit_clockevent_init(struct pit_timer *pit, void __iomem *base,
- unsigned long rate, int irq)
+ unsigned long rate, int irq, int cpu)
{
/*
* PIT0 and PIT1 can be chained to build a 64-bit timer, so
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static int __init pit_clockevent_init(struct pit_timer *pit, void __iomem *base,
BUG_ON(request_irq(irq, pit_timer_interrupt, IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_IRQPOLL,
"VF pit timer", &pit->ced));
- pit->ced.cpumask = cpumask_of(0);
+ pit->ced.cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
pit->ced.irq = irq;
pit->ced.name = "VF pit timer";
@@ -221,6 +221,6 @@ static int __init pit_timer_init(struct device_node *np)
if (ret)
return ret;
- return pit_clockevent_init(&pit_timer, timer_base, clk_rate, irq);
+ return pit_clockevent_init(&pit_timer, timer_base, clk_rate, irq, 0);
}
TIMER_OF_DECLARE(vf610, "fsl,vf610-pit", pit_timer_init);
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists