[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250706193207.39810-7-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 12:32:07 -0700
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
damon@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel-team@...a.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] mm/damon/reclaim: use parameter context correctly
damon_reclaim_apply_parameters() allocates a new DAMON context, stages
user-specified DAMON parameters on it, and commits to running DAMON
context at once, using damon_commit_ctx(). The code is mistakenly
over-writing the monitoring attributes and the reclaim scheme on the
running context. It is not causing a real problem for monitoring
attributes, but the scheme overwriting can remove scheme's internal
status such as charged quota. Fix the wrong use of the parameter
context.
Fixes: 11ddcfc257a3 ("mm/damon/reclaim: use damon_commit_ctx()")
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
---
mm/damon/reclaim.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/damon/reclaim.c b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
index c91098d8aa51..0fe8996328b8 100644
--- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c
+++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static int damon_reclaim_apply_parameters(void)
if (err)
return err;
- err = damon_set_attrs(ctx, &damon_reclaim_mon_attrs);
+ err = damon_set_attrs(param_ctx, &damon_reclaim_mon_attrs);
if (err)
goto out;
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static int damon_reclaim_apply_parameters(void)
scheme = damon_reclaim_new_scheme();
if (!scheme)
goto out;
- damon_set_schemes(ctx, &scheme, 1);
+ damon_set_schemes(param_ctx, &scheme, 1);
if (quota_mem_pressure_us) {
goal = damos_new_quota_goal(DAMOS_QUOTA_SOME_MEM_PSI_US,
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists