[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <175184307927.139015.14590076333078183263.b4-ty@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 01:04:39 +0200
From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
To: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 00/80] treewide: Remove redundant
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls
On Fri, 04 Jul 2025 10:52:25 +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Late last year I posted a set to switch to __pm_runtime_mark_last_busy()
> and gradually get rid of explicit pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls in
> drivers, embedding them in the appropriate pm_runtime_*autosuspend*()
> calls. The overall feedback I got at the time was that this is an
> unnecessary intermediate step, and removing the
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls can be done after adding them to the
> relevant Runtime PM autosuspend related functions. The latter part has
> been done and is present in Rafael's tree at the moment, also see
> <URL:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/CAJZ5v0g7-8UWp6ATOy+=oGdxDaCnfKHBG_+kbiTr+VeuXZsUFQ@mail.gmail.com/>:
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[54/80] power: supply: bq24190: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls
commit: 2453753f395e68af947d9ac6ce37bf0eb40f7123
[55/80] power: supply: twl4030_charger: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls
commit: f9335bb4f5d4f3b913efd5872c2794d027dd85a6
Best regards,
--
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists