linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/218] 6.12.36-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3f9adf2a-e360-48b9-901d-ecd96c10a620@hardfalcon.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 08:56:33 +0200
From: Pascal Ernster <git@...dfalcon.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
 akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
 patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
 jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
 srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
 hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/218] 6.12.36-rc1 review

[2025-07-06 08:51] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> Yes, intentional, I only do new -rcs if people are reporting build/run
> errors on -rcs, but we drop patches that people ask us to drop or fix in
> the queue without doing new -rc releases as that's not really needed.

Ahh, makes sense, thanks for the explanation! :)


> A tested-by would be great if you want to provide it, thanks!

Tested-by: Pascal Ernster <git@...dfalcon.net>

Boot-tested on the following platforms:

- x86_64: Intel Haswell VM
- MIPS 4KEc V7.0: Netgear GS108T v3 (SoC: Realtek RTL8380M)
- MIPS 4KEc V7.0: Netgear GS310TP v1 (SoC: Realtek RTL8380M)
- MIPS 74Kc V5.0: TP-Link Archer C7 v4 (SoC: Qualcomm QCA956X)


Regards
Pascal