linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 17/22] arm64: mm: Add page fault trace points

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250708133135.afWClD2E@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 15:31:35 +0200
From: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>,
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	john.ogness@...utronix.de,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 17/22] arm64: mm: Add page fault trace points

On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 02:16:16PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> As per the discussion with Steve on v6, I still object to relying on the
> arch code to call all these different trace helpers (rv, kprobes, perf)
> in the right place and consistently with each other.
> 
> In:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250519120837.794f6738@batman.local.home
> 
> Steve suggested wrapping some of this up in a core function to help with
> that.

I have dropped this one from my latest version, so that the series can move
forward while we figure this part out.

Best regards,
Nam