[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aG0qB2OEUmBTKzpY@google.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 07:24:07 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] MAINTAINERS: Update the file list in the TDX entry.
On Tue, Jul 08, 2025, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 7/8/25 03:19, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > @@ -26952,12 +26952,18 @@ L: linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev
> > S: Supported
> > T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86/tdx
> > F: Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-virtual-misc-tdx_guest
> > +F: Documentation/arch/x86/tdx.rst
> > +F: Documentation/virt/coco/tdx-guest.rst
> > +F: Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/intel-tdx.rst
> > F: arch/x86/boot/compressed/tdx*
> > +F: arch/x86/boot/compressed/tdcall.S
> > F: arch/x86/coco/tdx/
> > -F: arch/x86/include/asm/shared/tdx.h
> > -F: arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h
> > +F: arch/x86/include/asm/shared/tdx*
> > +F: arch/x86/include/asm/tdx*
> > +F: arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx*
> > F: arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/
> > -F: drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest
> > +F: drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/
> > +F: tools/testing/selftests/tdx/
>
> That file list is getting a bit long, but it _is_ the truth.
What about adding
K: tdx
instead of listing each file individually? That might also help clarify what's
up for cases where there is overlap, e.g. with KVM, to convey that this is a
"secondary" entry of sorts.
> It's also adding some arch/x86/kvm/vmx/ files, but I assume Sean and
> Paolo will welcome having some more people cc'd on those patches. The
> hyper-v folks have a similar entry.
No objection from me.
> I'll plan to apply this as-is unless someone screams.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists