[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<175198921449.4109948.4233904328306529560.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 15:40:14 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: lorenzo@...nel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, nbd@....name,
sean.wang@...iatek.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, elder@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Use of_reserved_mem_region_to_resource{_byname}()
for
"memory-region"
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 13:34:57 -0500 you wrote:
> Use the newly added of_reserved_mem_region_to_resource{_byname}()
> functions to handle "memory-region" properties.
>
> The error handling is a bit different for mtk_wed_mcu_load_firmware().
> A failed match of the "memory-region-names" would skip the entry, but
> then other errors in the lookup and retrieval of the address would not
> skip the entry. However, that distinction is not really important.
> Either the region is available and usable or it is not. So now, errors
> from of_reserved_mem_region_to_resource() are ignored so the region is
> simply skipped.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- net: Use of_reserved_mem_region_to_resource{_byname}() for "memory-region"
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e27dba1951ce
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists