[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250708160652.1810573-1-arnd@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 18:06:43 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Carolina Jubran <cjubran@...dia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] devlink: move DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX-sized array off stack
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
There are many possible devlink attributes, so having an array of them
on the stack can cause a warning for excessive stack usage:
net/devlink/rate.c: In function 'devlink_nl_rate_tc_bw_parse':
net/devlink/rate.c:382:1: error: the frame size of 1648 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
Change this to dynamic allocation instead.
Fixes: 566e8f108fc7 ("devlink: Extend devlink rate API with traffic classes bandwidth management")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
I see that only two of the many array entries are actually used in this
function: DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TC_INDEX and DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TC_BW. If there
is an interface to extract just a single entry, using that would be
a little easier than the kcalloc().
---
net/devlink/rate.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/devlink/rate.c b/net/devlink/rate.c
index d39300a9b3d4..e4083649748f 100644
--- a/net/devlink/rate.c
+++ b/net/devlink/rate.c
@@ -346,19 +346,23 @@ static int devlink_nl_rate_tc_bw_parse(struct nlattr *parent_nest, u32 *tc_bw,
unsigned long *bitmap,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
- struct nlattr *tb[DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX + 1];
+ struct nlattr **tb;
u8 tc_index;
int err;
+ tb = kcalloc(DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX + 1, sizeof(struct nlattr *), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tb)
+ return -ENOMEM;
err = nla_parse_nested(tb, DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX, parent_nest,
devlink_dl_rate_tc_bws_nl_policy, extack);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto out;
+ err = -EINVAL;
if (!tb[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TC_INDEX]) {
NL_SET_ERR_ATTR_MISS(extack, parent_nest,
DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TC_INDEX);
- return -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
}
tc_index = nla_get_u8(tb[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TC_INDEX]);
@@ -366,19 +370,21 @@ static int devlink_nl_rate_tc_bw_parse(struct nlattr *parent_nest, u32 *tc_bw,
if (!tb[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TC_BW]) {
NL_SET_ERR_ATTR_MISS(extack, parent_nest,
DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TC_BW);
- return -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
}
if (test_and_set_bit(tc_index, bitmap)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack,
"Duplicate traffic class index specified (%u)",
tc_index);
- return -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
}
tc_bw[tc_index] = nla_get_u32(tb[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_TC_BW]);
- return 0;
+out:
+ kfree(tb);
+ return err;
}
static int devlink_nl_rate_tc_bw_set(struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate,
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists