[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250708163320.GS452973@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 17:33:20 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>,
Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Tomasz Duszynski <tduszynski@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [net] Octeontx2-vf: Fix max packet length errors
On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 03:07:08PM +0530, Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> On 2025-07-04 at 20:45:11, Simon Horman (horms@...nel.org) wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 04:35:18PM +0530, Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> > > Implement packet length validation before submitting packets to
> > > the hardware to prevent MAXLEN_ERR.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 3184fb5ba96e ("octeontx2-vf: Virtual function driver support")
> > > Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_vf.c | 7 +++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_vf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_vf.c
> > > index 8a8b598bd389..766237cd86c3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_vf.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_vf.c
> > > @@ -394,6 +394,13 @@ static netdev_tx_t otx2vf_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev)
> > > struct otx2_snd_queue *sq;
> > > struct netdev_queue *txq;
> > >
> > > + /* Check for minimum and maximum packet length */
> > > + if (skb->len <= ETH_HLEN ||
> > > + (!skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size && skb->len > vf->tx_max_pktlen)) {
> > > + dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> > > + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> > > + }
> >
> > Hi Hariprasad,
> >
> > I see the same check in otx2_xmit().
> > But I wonder if in that case and this one the rx drop counter for the
> > netdev should be incremented.
> >
> Assuming its tx_drop counter, Will add suggested change in V2.
Yes, I think so.
> > Also, do you need this check in rvu_rep_xmit() too?
> >
> ACK, will add this check in V2.
Thanks.
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists