lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <E38B4D1E-C7C4-4694-94E7-5318AD47EE1C@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 13:03:39 -0400
From: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>
To: Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...nel.org>, Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>,
 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
 linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, djeffery@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] NFS: Improve nfsiod workqueue detection for
 allocation flags

On 8 Jul 2025, at 12:50, Laurence Oberman wrote:

> Both Ben's patch and Trond's fix the failing write issue so I guess we
> need to decide what the final fix will be.
>
> For both solutions
> Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>

Thanks Laurence! I think we'll leave these two patches behind.

I'm persuaded by Trond's arguments, and along with not needing to add the
workqueue helper, I've properly posted that approach here after some minimal
testing:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/6892807b15cb401f3015e2acdaf1c2ba2bcae130.1751975813.git.bcodding@redhat.com/T/#u

There's only a difference of a comment, so it should be safe to reply with
your Tested-by there.

Ben


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ