linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] NFS: Improve nfsiod workqueue detection for allocation flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <E38B4D1E-C7C4-4694-94E7-5318AD47EE1C@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 13:03:39 -0400
From: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>
To: Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...nel.org>, Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>,
 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
 linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, djeffery@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] NFS: Improve nfsiod workqueue detection for
 allocation flags

On 8 Jul 2025, at 12:50, Laurence Oberman wrote:

> Both Ben's patch and Trond's fix the failing write issue so I guess we
> need to decide what the final fix will be.
>
> For both solutions
> Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>

Thanks Laurence! I think we'll leave these two patches behind.

I'm persuaded by Trond's arguments, and along with not needing to add the
workqueue helper, I've properly posted that approach here after some minimal
testing:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/6892807b15cb401f3015e2acdaf1c2ba2bcae130.1751975813.git.bcodding@redhat.com/T/#u

There's only a difference of a comment, so it should be safe to reply with
your Tested-by there.

Ben