[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <gsnt34b61fd0.fsf@coltonlewis-kvm.c.googlers.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 22:34:35 +0000
From: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
maz@...nel.org, oliver.upton@...ux.dev, mizhang@...gle.com,
joey.gouly@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com, yuzenghui@...wei.com,
shuah@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/22] arm64: cpufeature: Add cpucap for HPMN0
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 08:04:37PM +0000, Colton Lewis wrote:
>> Add a capability for FEAT_HPMN0, whether MDCR_EL2.HPMN can specify 0
>> counters reserved for the guest.
>> This required changing HPMN0 to an UnsignedEnum in tools/sysreg
>> because otherwise not all the appropriate macros are generated to add
>> it to arm64_cpu_capabilities_arm64_features.
> I agree it's appropriate to mark ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.HPMN0 as an
> UnsignedEnum. It follows the usual ID scheme per ARM DDI 0487 L.a
> section D24.1.3, and zero means not present, so it must be unsigned.
> Likewise, the value renames (UNPREDICTABLE => NI and DEF => IMP) look
> fine to me.
>> Signed-off-by: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>
> I have one minor nit below, but either way:
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Thank you Mark
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 8 ++++++++
>> arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 6 +++---
>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> index b34044e20128..73a7dac4b6f6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> @@ -548,6 +548,7 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_mmfr0[] = {
>> };
>> static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr0[] = {
>> + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE,
>> ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_HPMN0_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE,
>> ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DoubleLock_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE,
>> ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE,
>> ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_CTX_CMPs_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> @@ -2896,6 +2897,13 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities
>> arm64_features[] = {
>> .matches = has_cpuid_feature,
>> ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, FGT, FGT2)
>> },
>> + {
>> + .desc = "FEAT_HPMN0",
> Minor nit, but we can drop the "FEAT_" prefix here, for consistency with
> other features (e.g. E0PD, FPMR).
> Mark.
Will do.
>> + .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
>> + .capability = ARM64_HAS_HPMN0,
>> + .matches = has_cpuid_feature,
>> + ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, HPMN0, IMP)
>> + },
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SME
>> {
>> .desc = "Scalable Matrix Extension",
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
>> index 10effd4cff6b..5b196ba21629 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ HAS_GIC_CPUIF_SYSREGS
>> HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING
>> HAS_GIC_PRIO_RELAXED_SYNC
>> HAS_HCR_NV1
>> +HAS_HPMN0
>> HAS_HCX
>> HAS_LDAPR
>> HAS_LPA2
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
>> index 8a8cf6874298..d29742481754 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
>> @@ -1531,9 +1531,9 @@ EndEnum
>> EndSysreg
>> Sysreg ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 3 0 0 5 0
>> -Enum 63:60 HPMN0
>> - 0b0000 UNPREDICTABLE
>> - 0b0001 DEF
>> +UnsignedEnum 63:60 HPMN0
>> + 0b0000 NI
>> + 0b0001 IMP
>> EndEnum
>> UnsignedEnum 59:56 ExtTrcBuff
>> 0b0000 NI
>> --
>> 2.50.0.727.gbf7dc18ff4-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists