[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca58608c-c147-45a7-910f-41a7c312fd5a@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 08:29:43 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee@...wei.com>, mark.rutland@....com,
robh@...nel.org
Cc: coresight@...ts.linaro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
dianders@...omium.org, james.clark@...aro.org, jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...wei.com,
mike.leach@...aro.org, ruanjinjie@...wei.com, saravanak@...gle.com,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com, suzuki.poulose@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] arch_topology: update CPU map to use the new API
On 07/07/2025 17:04, Alireza Sanaee wrote:
> Cleans up the cpu-map generation using the created API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> index 3ebe77566788..88970f13f684 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -518,23 +518,23 @@ core_initcall(free_raw_capacity);
> */
> static int __init get_cpu_for_node(struct device_node *node)
> {
> + struct device_node *cpu_node __free(device_node) = NULL;
That's not a correct style anymore. What's more it is not really
explained anywhere. Follow standard cleanup.h rules (constructor).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists