[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250708174938.0d02040c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 17:49:38 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Matthias Maennich <maennich@...gle.com>, Jonathan Corbet
<corbet@....net>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Petr Pavlu
<petr.pavlu@...e.com>, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, Daniel
Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Nicolas Schier
<nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Christoph
Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, David
Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Shivank Garg <shivankg@....com>, "Jiri
Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Greg KH
<greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Restrict module namespace to in-tree modules and
rename macro
Hi Vlastimil,
On Tue, 08 Jul 2025 09:28:56 +0200 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> Christian asked [1] for EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES() without the _GPL_
> part to avoid controversy converting selected existing EXPORT_SYMBOL().
> Christoph argued [2] that the _FOR_MODULES() export is intended for
> in-tree modules and thus GPL is implied anyway and can be simply dropped
> from the export macro name. Peter agreed [3] about the intention for
> in-tree modules only, although nothing currently enforces it.
>
> It seems straightforward to add this enforcement, so patch 1 does that.
> Patch 2 then drops the _GPL_ from the name and so we're left with
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES() restricted to in-tree modules only.
>
> Current -next has some new instances of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FOR_MODULES()
> in drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_rsa.c by commit b20d6576cdb3 ("serial:
> 8250: export RSA functions"). Hopefully it's resolvable by a merge
> commit fixup and we don't need to provide a temporary alias.
Thanks for the heads up and it seems easy enough. You probably should
have cc'd Greg KH (the maintainer for the tty tree), though (done now).
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250623-warmwasser-giftig-ff656fce89ad@brauner/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aFleJN_fE-RbSoFD@infradead.org/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250623142836.GT1613200@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> ---
> Vlastimil Babka (2):
> module: Restrict module namespace access to in-tree modules
> module: Rename EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FOR_MODULES to EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES
>
> Documentation/core-api/symbol-namespaces.rst | 11 ++++++-----
> fs/anon_inodes.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/export.h | 2 +-
> kernel/module/main.c | 3 ++-
> scripts/mod/modpost.c | 6 +++++-
> 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: d7b8f8e20813f0179d8ef519541a3527e7661d3a
> change-id: 20250708-export_modules-12908fa41006
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists