[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250708-fortunate-agate-coyote-e3b022@krzk-bin>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 10:52:02 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>, Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@...cinc.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom,qcs615-rpmh: Drop
IPA interconnects
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 09:37:57PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
>
> This has been agreed to be characterized as a clock resource, not an
> interconnect provider. Bring QCS615 in line with the expectation.
>
> Fixes: 6c5e948f1fff ("dt-bindings: interconnect: document the RPMh Network-On-Chip interconnect in QCS615 SoC")
You did not explain any bug here to fix. Difference in agreements in
characterization does not feel like a bug.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists