[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGzizyLX8HDWsWWm@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 12:20:15 +0300
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>,
Frank Li <frank.li@....com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@....nxp.com>,
Sandor Yu <Sandor.yu@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] clock: imx95: Add LVDS/DISPLAY CSR for i.MX94
On 25-07-07 10:24:36, Peng Fan wrote:
> Similar to i.MX95, i.MX94 also has LVDS/DISPLAY CSR to provide
> clock gate for LVDS and DISPLAY Controller. So following same approach
> to add the support, as what have been done for i.MX95.
>
> Patch 1 is to add the binding doc.
> Patch 2 is fixes when supporting i.MX94, but the issues are
> also exposed to i.MX95 even not triggered. No need to rush the
> two patches for 6.16.
> Patch 3 and 4 is to add the clk driver. Patch 3 is almost picked from
> NXP downstream with a minor update. Patch 4 is modified from NXP
> downstream with a few minor patches merged and updated.
> Patch 5 is the dts part to give reviewer a whole view on how it is used.
>
> Thanks for Frank Li helping do NXP internal review for the patchset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
For some reason, this doesn't apply cleanly.
Can you rebase on 6.16-rc1 and resend?
Thanks,
Abel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists