linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/80] treewide: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aGzsZLIL9L62dGTU@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 10:01:08 +0000
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/80] treewide: Remove redundant
 pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls

Hi Mark,

On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 01:04:51PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 10:52:25AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> 
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \
> > 		pm-runtime-6.17-rc1
> 
> > So before merging these, please pull Rafael's tag. My thinking is indeed
> > these would be best merged via the respective trees as there's some
> > potential for conflicts (there are around 920 call sites modified here).
> 
> Please if you're doing things like this in future could you send
> individual serieses to each subsystem - it just makes everything
> clearer, for those of us with multiple subsystems it makes life easier
> and a series this big causes scaling issues with the tooling (it took
> several minutes for b4 to figure out a base...).

Thanks for the feedback.

I guess at this phase it's really just mechanical and the added benefit of
having a single cover letter is minimal. Right now it looks like only a few
subsystems need v2 of this (drm, media and iio).

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus