[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <175197733309.276747.1347706075364482943.robh@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 07:22:14 -0500
From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] docs: dt: writing-bindings: Express better
expectations of "specific"
On Mon, 07 Jul 2025 11:50:21 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Devicetree bindings are supposed to be specific in terms of compatibles
> and other properties. Short "specific" has many implications, so extend
> the description to cover them:
>
> 1. Mention no family names and avoid generic SoC fallbacks in
> compatible. The list grew, mixing DO's and DON'T's, so split it into
> multiple items.
>
> 2. No properties implied by the compatible.
>
> 3. Document desired lack of ABI impact and acceptable solution if such
> needs arises: clearly marking it in commit msg.
>
> All above follows established Devicetree bindings maintainers review
> practice, so no new rules in practice are introduced here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> Implement entire Conor's feedback:
> 1. Grammar
> 2. Split DO/DON'T in compatible section
> 3. Rephrase the ABI break
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst | 27 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists