lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5625ffa1-f952-4646-a17a-fbbfffcdba2a@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 17:39:31 +0530
From: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@....qualcomm.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi
 <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, mhi@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, ath11k@...ts.infradead.org,
        qiang.yu@....qualcomm.com, quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com,
        quic_vpernami@...cinc.com, quic_mrana@...cinc.com,
        Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/11] bus: mhi: host: Add support to read MHI
 capabilities



On 7/8/2025 10:06 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 04:21:24PM GMT, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
>> From: Vivek Pernamitta <quic_vpernami@...cinc.com>
>>
>> As per MHI spec v1.2,sec 6.6, MHI has capability registers which are
>> located after the ERDB array. The location of this group of registers is
>> indicated by the MISCOFF register. Each capability has a capability ID to
>> determine which functionality is supported and each capability will point
>> to the next capability supported.
>>
>> Add a basic function to read those capabilities offsets.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Pernamitta <quic_vpernami@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/bus/mhi/common.h    | 13 +++++++++++++
>>   drivers/bus/mhi/host/init.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/common.h b/drivers/bus/mhi/common.h
>> index dda340aaed95a5573a2ec776ca712e11a1ed0b52..58f27c6ba63e3e6fa28ca48d6d1065684ed6e1dd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/common.h
>> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/common.h
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>>   #define MHICFG				0x10
>>   #define CHDBOFF				0x18
>>   #define ERDBOFF				0x20
>> +#define MISCOFF				0x24
>>   #define BHIOFF				0x28
>>   #define BHIEOFF				0x2c
>>   #define DEBUGOFF			0x30
>> @@ -113,6 +114,9 @@
>>   #define MHISTATUS_MHISTATE_MASK		GENMASK(15, 8)
>>   #define MHISTATUS_SYSERR_MASK		BIT(2)
>>   #define MHISTATUS_READY_MASK		BIT(0)
>> +#define MISC_CAP_MASK			GENMASK(31, 0)
>> +#define CAP_CAPID_MASK			GENMASK(31, 24)
>> +#define CAP_NEXT_CAP_MASK		GENMASK(23, 12)
>>   
>>   /* Command Ring Element macros */
>>   /* No operation command */
>> @@ -204,6 +208,15 @@
>>   #define MHI_RSCTRE_DATA_DWORD1		cpu_to_le32(FIELD_PREP(GENMASK(23, 16), \
>>   							       MHI_PKT_TYPE_COALESCING))
>>   
>> +enum mhi_capability_type {
>> +	MHI_CAP_ID_INTX = 0x1,
>> +	MHI_CAP_ID_TIME_SYNC = 0x2,
>> +	MHI_CAP_ID_BW_SCALE = 0x3,
>> +	MHI_CAP_ID_TSC_TIME_SYNC = 0x4,
>> +	MHI_CAP_ID_MAX_TRB_LEN = 0x5,
>> +	MHI_CAP_ID_MAX,
>> +};
>> +
>>   enum mhi_pkt_type {
>>   	MHI_PKT_TYPE_INVALID = 0x0,
>>   	MHI_PKT_TYPE_NOOP_CMD = 0x1,
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/init.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/init.c
>> index 13e7a55f54ff45b83b3f18b97e2cdd83d4836fe3..9102ce13a2059f599b46d25ef631f643142642be 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/init.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/init.c
>> @@ -467,6 +467,40 @@ int mhi_init_dev_ctxt(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int mhi_find_capability(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl, u32 capability, u32 *offset)
>> +{
>> +	u32 val, cur_cap, next_offset;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	/* Get the first supported capability offset */
>> +	ret = mhi_read_reg_field(mhi_cntrl, mhi_cntrl->regs, MISCOFF, MISC_CAP_MASK, offset);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	*offset = (__force u32)le32_to_cpu(*offset);
> 
> Why do you need __force attribute? What does it suppress? Is it because the
> pointer is not le32?
> 
yes to suppress warnings.

- Krishna Chaitanya.
> - Mani
> 
>> +	do {
>> +		if (*offset >= mhi_cntrl->reg_len)
>> +			return -ENXIO;
>> +
>> +		ret = mhi_read_reg(mhi_cntrl, mhi_cntrl->regs, *offset, &val);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +
>> +		val = (__force u32)le32_to_cpu(val);
>> +		cur_cap = FIELD_GET(CAP_CAPID_MASK, val);
>> +		next_offset = FIELD_GET(CAP_NEXT_CAP_MASK, val);
>> +		if (cur_cap >= MHI_CAP_ID_MAX)
>> +			return -ENXIO;
>> +
>> +		if (cur_cap == capability)
>> +			return 0;
>> +
>> +		*offset = next_offset;
>> +	} while (next_offset);
>> +
>> +	return -ENXIO;
>> +}
>> +
>>   int mhi_init_mmio(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
>>   {
>>   	u32 val;
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ