[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e0d815a-774a-4e31-92f1-71e0772294c7@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 15:43:35 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, kwilczynski@...nel.org, mani@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
geert+renesas@...der.be, magnus.damm@...il.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, lizhi.hou@....com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Claudiu Beznea
<claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] dt-bindings: PCI: renesas,r9a08g045s33-pcie: Add
documentation for the PCIe IP on Renesas RZ/G3S
On 09/07/2025 15:24, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 08:47:05AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 08/07/2025 18:34, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 07:14:04PM +0300, Claudiu wrote:
>>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
>>>>
>>>> The PCIe IP available on the Renesas RZ/G3S complies with the PCI Express
>>>> Base Specification 4.0. It is designed for root complex applications and
>>>> features a single-lane (x1) implementation. Add documentation for it.
>>>
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/renesas,r9a08g045s33-pcie.yaml
>>>
>>> The "r9a08g045s33" in the filename seems oddly specific. Does it
>>> leave room for descendants of the current chip that will inevitably be
>>> added in the future? Most bindings are named with a fairly generic
>>> family name, e.g., "fsl,layerscape", "hisilicon,kirin", "intel,
>>> keembay", "samsung,exynos", etc.
>>>
>>
>> Bindings should be named by compatible, not in a generic way, so name is
>> correct. It can always grow with new compatibles even if name matches
>> old one, it's not a problem.
>
> Ok, thanks!
>
> I guess that means I'm casting shade on the "r9a08g045s33" compatible.
> I suppose it means something to somebody.
Well, I hope it matches the name of the SoC, from which the compatible
should come :)
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists