linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] mm/damon/vaddr: Allow interleaving in migrate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMvvPS7avR+xEk7e+n5X-rwDFnFCf3e7ubJPHAQfRQVmyZJMjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 09:07:14 -0500
From: Bijan Tabatabai <bijan311@...il.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc: damon@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, corbet@....net, 
	bijantabatab@...ron.com, venkataravis@...ron.com, emirakhur@...ron.com, 
	vtavarespetr@...ron.com, ajayjoshi@...ron.com, 
	bijan <bijan@...e0.bijan-262664.superpages-pg0.wisc.cloudlab.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] mm/damon/vaddr: Allow interleaving in
 migrate_{hot,cold} actions

On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 6:06 AM SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue,  8 Jul 2025 19:59:30 -0500 Bijan Tabatabai <bijan311@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > From: bijan <bijan@...e0.bijan-262664.superpages-pg0.wisc.cloudlab.us>
>
> Maybe this is not an intended part but something from misconfiguration?  I show
> Andrew merged this series into mm-new after removing this, but headsup for a
> case that we might do rebase.

Sorry about that. I had to switch the machine I was generating patches
on and forgot to setup the git config. I'll make sure it doesn't
happen if I need to resend.

[...]
> > Revision History
> > ================
> > Changes from v3 [10]:
> > - Fix bug where huge pages would be split
>
> Maybe "walk->action = ACTION_CONTINUE;" of ninth patch?  Nice finding!

Yes, that was the change.

> Nontheless, since this was found by you and didn't discussed in public before,
> it would be nice to add a short additional clarifications like above, if we
> (unlikely) do rebase.

I will do this if a rebase if necessary.

[...]
>
> For the entire series,
>
> Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ

Thank you for all of your feedback and time spent on reviews!

Bijan