lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aG54B8frrerb0pn4@google.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 07:09:11 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bp@...en8.de, tglx@...utronix.de, 
	mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, Thomas.Lendacky@....com, 
	nikunj@....com, Santosh.Shukla@....com, Vasant.Hegde@....com, 
	Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com, David.Kaplan@....com, x86@...nel.org, 
	hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, 
	kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, huibo.wang@....com, naveen.rao@....com, 
	kai.huang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 04/35] KVM: x86: Rename VEC_POS/REG_POS macro usages

On Wed, Jul 09, 2025, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
> @@ -736,12 +735,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_apic_clear_irr);
>  
>  static void *apic_vector_to_isr(int vec, struct kvm_lapic *apic)
>  {
> -	return apic->regs + APIC_ISR + REG_POS(vec);
> +	return apic->regs + APIC_ISR + APIC_VECTOR_TO_REG_OFFSET(vec);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void apic_set_isr(int vec, struct kvm_lapic *apic)
>  {
> -	if (__test_and_set_bit(VEC_POS(vec), apic_vector_to_isr(vec, apic)))
> +	if (__test_and_set_bit(APIC_VECTOR_TO_BIT_NUMBER(vec), apic_vector_to_isr(vec, apic)))
>  		return;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -784,7 +783,7 @@ static inline int apic_find_highest_isr(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
>  
>  static inline void apic_clear_isr(int vec, struct kvm_lapic *apic)
>  {
> -	if (!__test_and_clear_bit(VEC_POS(vec), apic_vector_to_isr(vec, apic)))
> +	if (!__test_and_clear_bit(APIC_VECTOR_TO_BIT_NUMBER(vec), apic_vector_to_isr(vec, apic)))
>  		return;
>  
>  	/*

Almost forgot.  I'd prefer to wrap these two, i.e.

	if (__test_and_set_bit(APIC_VECTOR_TO_BIT_NUMBER(vec),
			       apic_vector_to_isr(vec, apic)))
		return;

and

	if (!__test_and_clear_bit(APIC_VECTOR_TO_BIT_NUMBER(vec),
				  apic_vector_to_isr(vec, apic)))
		return;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ