[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aG6Ja_Y9JNKkEon6@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 17:23:23 +0200
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andre Edich <andre.edich@...rochip.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/3] net: phy: allow drivers to disable polling
via get_next_update_time()
On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 04:10:48PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > /* Only re-schedule a PHY state machine change if we are polling the
> > - * PHY, if PHY_MAC_INTERRUPT is set, then we will be moving
> > - * between states from phy_mac_interrupt().
> > + * PHY. If PHY_MAC_INTERRUPT is set or get_next_update_time() returns
> > + * PHY_STATE_IRQ, then we rely on interrupts for state changes.
> > *
> > * In state PHY_HALTED the PHY gets suspended, so rescheduling the
> > * state machine would be pointless and possibly error prone when
> > * called from phy_disconnect() synchronously.
> > */
> > - if (phy_polling_mode(phydev) && phy_is_started(phydev))
> > - phy_queue_state_machine(phydev,
> > - phy_get_next_update_time(phydev));
> > + if (phy_polling_mode(phydev) && phy_is_started(phydev)) {
> > + unsigned int next_time = phy_get_next_update_time(phydev);
> > +
> > + /* Drivers returning PHY_STATE_IRQ opt out of polling.
> > + * Use IRQ-only mode by not re-queuing the state machine.
> > + */
> > + if (next_time != PHY_STATE_IRQ)
> > + phy_queue_state_machine(phydev, next_time);
> > + }
>
> How does this interact with update_stats()?
>
> phy_polling_mode() returns true because the update_stats() op is
> implemented. phy_get_next_update_time() returns PHY_STATE_IRQ, because
> the PHY is in a state where interrupts works, and then the statistics
> overflow.
>
> It seems like this code needs to be somehow made part of
> phy_polling_mode(), so that it has the full picture of why polling is
> being used.
Ah, good point! I forgot about it.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists