[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250709170403.2453228-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 10:03:56 -0700
From: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>
To: Suresh Chandrappa <suresh.k.chandrappa@...il.com>
Cc: nphamcs@...il.com,
hannes@...xchg.org,
shuah@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests: cachestat: add tests for mmap
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 23:13:01 +0530 Suresh Chandrappa <suresh.k.chandrappa@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Joshua,
>
> Thanks for the feedback! In the first patch, both shmem and mmap operations
> are present, but I hadn’t introduced any logic to distinguish between them
> yet. That distinction is added in the second patch through a new API.
Hi Suresh,
Yes, this makes sense to me. I think what I was getting at was that we could
still make a conditional statement like
if (type == FILE_SHMEM)
ksft_print_msg("Unable to create shmem file.\n")'
else if (type == FILE_MMAP)
ksft_print_msg("Unable to create mmap file.\n");
(or use a switch statement)
...
And just refactor it in patch 2, as opposed to changing the behavior.
But this is mostly a nit. If you are planning to merge both patches in one
patch in the next version, then all of these comments shouldn't matter : -)
Looking forward to the next version, have a great day!
Joshua
Sent using hkml (https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists