[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfd970bb10235adfa2b2b545ea26bffba1ea3a66.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 14:08:42 -0400
From: mlevitsk@...hat.com
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Yuntao Liu <liuyuntao12@...wei.com>, Sean Christopherson
<seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: avoid underflow when scaling TSC frequency
On Wed, 2025-07-09 at 13:53 -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> In function kvm_guest_time_update(), __scale_tsc() is used to calculate
> a TSC *frequency* rather than a TSC value. With low-enough ratios,
> a TSC value that is less than 1 would underflow to 0 and to an infinite
> while loop in kvm_get_time_scale():
>
> kvm_guest_time_update(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
> if (kvm_caps.has_tsc_control)
> tgt_tsc_khz = kvm_scale_tsc(tgt_tsc_khz,
> v->arch.l1_tsc_scaling_ratio);
> __scale_tsc(u64 ratio, u64 tsc)
> ratio=122380531, tsc=2299998, N=48
> ratio*tsc >> N = 0.999... -> 0
>
> Later in the function:
>
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> kvm_get_time_scale arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2458 [inline]
> kvm_guest_time_update+0x926/0xb00 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:3268
> vcpu_enter_guest.constprop.0+0x1e70/0x3cf0 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:10678
> vcpu_run+0x129/0x8d0 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11126
> kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x37a/0x13d0 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11352
> kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x56b/0xe60 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:4188
> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
> __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline]
> __se_sys_ioctl+0x12d/0x190 fs/ioctl.c:857
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x59/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:81
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0xe2
>
> This can really happen only when fuzzing, since the TSC frequency
> would have to be nonsensically low.
>
> Fixes: 35181e86df97 ("KVM: x86: Add a common TSC scaling function")
> Reported-by: Yuntao Liu <liuyuntao12@...wei.com>
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index b58a74c1722d..de51dbd85a58 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -3258,9 +3258,11 @@ int kvm_guest_time_update(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
>
> /* With all the info we got, fill in the values */
>
> - if (kvm_caps.has_tsc_control)
> + if (kvm_caps.has_tsc_control) {
> tgt_tsc_khz = kvm_scale_tsc(tgt_tsc_khz,
> v->arch.l1_tsc_scaling_ratio);
> + tgt_tsc_khz = tgt_tsc_khz ? : 1;
> + }
>
> if (unlikely(vcpu->hw_tsc_khz != tgt_tsc_khz)) {
> kvm_get_time_scale(NSEC_PER_SEC, tgt_tsc_khz * 1000LL,
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
Powered by blists - more mailing lists