[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250709150452.6646c168@batman.local.home>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 15:04:52 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Sergey
Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 02/12] printk: Make vprintk_deferred() public
On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 20:53:34 +0200
Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de> wrote:
> It is possible that you make this amendment when/if you apply the patch, or
> do you prefer me sending a new version?
I could do it, but if you send a new version, it will keep patchwork
automated. When I edit a patch, the status doesn't automatically get
updated due to the change.
I know it's minor, but could you send a v13? Then when the patch gets
accepted in mainline, it should automatically turn to Accept in
patchwork.
Thanks,
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists