lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21c6f554-fbbf-4856-823f-f58c9956f8ef@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 15:58:19 -0400
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PM: sleep: Call pm_restore_gfp_mask() after
 dpm_resume()

On 7/9/2025 1:12 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Commit 12ffc3b1513e ("PM: Restrict swap use to later in the suspend
> sequence") changed two pm_restore_gfp_mask() calls in enter_state()
> and hibernation_restore() into one pm_restore_gfp_mask() call in
> dpm_resume_end(), but it put that call before the dpm_resume()
> invocation which is too early (some swap-backing devices may not be
> ready at that point).
> 
> Moreover, this code ordering change was not even mentioned in the
> changelog of the commit mentioned above.
> 
> Address this by moving that call after the dpm_resume() one.
> 
> Fixes: 12ffc3b1513e ("PM: Restrict swap use to later in the suspend sequence")
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
>   drivers/base/power/main.c |    2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> @@ -1254,8 +1254,8 @@
>    */
>   void dpm_resume_end(pm_message_t state)
>   {
> -	pm_restore_gfp_mask();
>   	dpm_resume(state);
> +	pm_restore_gfp_mask();
>   	dpm_complete(state);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpm_resume_end);
> 
> 
> 

Thanks, I looked through the codepaths and I agree with this change. 
Thanks for catching it.

Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ