[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cover.1752094439.git.mst@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 16:55:24 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
stefanha@...hat.com, alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC v5 0/5] pci,virtio: report surprise removal event
Lukas, Keith, Bjorn, others, would very much appreciate your comments
on whether the pci core changes are acceptable.
Parav, I expect this to be integrated into your work on fixing surprise
removal. As such, I am not queueing these patches yet - please include with your
other patches fixing these issues.
==========
This is an attempt to fix the following race in virtio:
when device removal is initiated by a user
action, such as driver unbind, it in turn initiates driver cleanup and
is then waiting for an interrupt from the device. If the device is now
surprise-removed, that interrupt never arrives and the remove callback hangs
forever.
For example, this was reported for virtio-blk:
1. the graceful removal is ongoing in the remove() callback, where disk
deletion del_gendisk() is ongoing, which waits for the requests +to
complete,
2. Now few requests are yet to complete, and surprise removal started.
At this point, virtio block driver will not get notified by the driver
core layer, because it is likely serializing remove() happening by
+user/driver unload and PCI hotplug driver-initiated device removal. So
vblk driver doesn't know that device is removed, block layer is waiting
for requests completions to arrive which it never gets. So
del_gendisk() gets stuck.
We could add timeouts to handle that, but given virtio blk devices are
implemented in userspace, this makes the device flaky.
Instead, this adds pci core infrastructure, and virtio core
infrastructure, for drivers to be notified of device disconnect.
Actual cleanup in virtio-blk is still TBD.
Compile-tested only.
==========
Notes on the design:
Care was taken to avoid re-introducing the bug fixed by
commit 74ff8864cc84 ("PCI: hotplug: Allow marking devices as disconnected during bind/unbind")
To avoid taking locks on removal path, and to avoid invoking callback
with unpredictable latency, the event is reported through a WQ.
Adding APIs to enable/disable the reporting on probe/remove, helps make
sure the driver won't go away in the middle of the handling, all
without taking any locks.
The benefit is that the resulting API is harder than a callback to
misuse, adding unpredictable latencies to unplug. The WQ can simply do
the cleanup directly, taking any locks it needs for that. The cost is
several extra bytes per device, which seems modest.
Previous discussion:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/11cfcb55b5302999b0e58b94018f92a379196698.1751136072.git.mst@redhat.com
Changes from v4:
fix !CONFIG_PCI, reported by Stephen
Changes from v3:
added documentation to address comments by Parav
support in virtio core
Changes from v2:
v2 was corrupted, fat fingers :(
Changes from v1:
switched to a WQ, with APIs to enable/disable
added motivation
==========
Michael S. Tsirkin (5):
pci: report surprise removal event
virtio: fix comments, readability
virtio: pack config changed flags
virtio: allow transports to suppress config change
virtio: support device disconnect
drivers/pci/pci.h | 6 ++++
drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 23 +++++++++++++--
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h | 3 ++
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c | 2 ++
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 2 ++
include/linux/pci.h | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/virtio.h | 11 ++++++--
include/linux/virtio_config.h | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++
9 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists