[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAORQ5J5my3cd-nb=6wJ68s8wJ5BPi+JSu1Mo7JdHiLTD+XnB6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 14:29:31 -0700
From: Alexandru Stan <ams@...me.work>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Christian Heusel <christian@...sel.eu>, stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com,
broonie@...nel.org, linux@...me.work
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.15 000/178] 6.15.6-rc1 review
Hey Greg,
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 10:20 AM Christian Heusel <christian@...sel.eu> wrote:
> on the Framework Desktop I'm getting a new regression / error message
> within dmesg on 6.15.6-rc1 which was not present in previous versions of
> the stable kernel series:
I debugged with Christian a little bit, turns out that particular
device ("arch-external") had a PD/UCSI firmware bug (which we have
fixed since). Perhaps the new kernel just exposed some more of the
broken firmware behavior. It does not reproduce with newer firmware.
I think we can safely ignore it for now.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 12:12 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> And maybe if my Framework Desktop would ever get shipped to me, I could
have debugged this ahead of time :)
Stay tuned ;)
Sorry for the false alarm,
Alexandru M. Stan (amstan)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists