[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250709153751.222ea2d1de1313a22a69e64e@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 15:37:51 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, David Hildenbrand
<david@...hat.com>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Vlastimil Babka
<vbabka@...e.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Suren Baghdasaryan
<surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: implement "memory.oops_if_bad_pte=1" boot option
On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 21:10:59 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> Implement
>
> memory.oops_if_bad_pte=1
>
> boot option which oopses the machine instead of dreadful
>
> BUG: Bad page map in process
>
> message.
>
> This is intended
> for people who want to panic at the slightest provocation and
> for people who ruled out hardware problems which in turn means that
> delaying vmcore collection is counter-productive.
>
> Linux doesn't (never?) panicked on PTE corruption and even implemented
> ratelimited version of the message meaning it can go for minutes and
> even hours without anyone noticing which is exactly the opposite of what
> should be done to facilitate debugging.
>
> Not enabled by default.
>
> Not advertised.
>
> @@ -490,6 +498,13 @@ static inline void add_mm_rss_vec(struct mm_struct *mm, int *rss)
> static void print_bad_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> pte_t pte, struct page *page)
> {
> + /*
> + * This line is a formality to collect vmcore ASAP. Real bug
> + * (hardware or software) happened earlier, current registers and
> + * backtrace aren't interesting.
> + */
> + BUG_ON(oops_if_bad_pte);
> +
Oh. A pretty simple thing to do with bpf? A script to tell the kernel
"dump vmcore if you get here" would have applications in places other
than print_bad_pte()?
That's what bpf_panic() was for (https://lwn.net/Articles/901284/) but
it apparently didn't get merged for <reasons>.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists