[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250709154152.8d2a3de8894b80e4d85d1692@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 15:41:52 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Steven
Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, Jon Pan-Doh
<pandoh@...gle.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Karolina Stolarek
<karolina.stolarek@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] lib: Add trivial kunit test for ratelimit
On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 11:03:33 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> Add a simple single-threaded smoke test for lib/ratelimit.c
>
> To run on x86:
>
> make ARCH=x86_64 mrproper
> ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch x86_64 --kconfig_add CONFIG_RATELIMIT_KUNIT_TEST=y --kconfig_add CONFIG_SMP=y lib_ratelimit
>
> This will fail on old ___ratelimit(), and subsequent patches provide
> the fixes that are required.
>
> [ paulmck: Apply timeout and kunit feedback from Petr Mladek. ]
The above line makes me suspect that this was paulmck tweaking someone
else's patch. If the authorship correct on this one?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists