[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPTae5KKK4pYo_BdK90=9u+5C0TeRHXnWKrHM3qzMpZ2yzWK5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 15:51:54 -0700
From: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>
To: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Amit Sunil Dhamne <amitsd@...gle.com>,
Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: typec: tcpm/tcpci_maxim: fix irq wake usage
On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 3:50 AM André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> This driver calls enable_irq_wake() during probe() unconditionally, and
> never issues the required corresponding disable_irq_wake() to disable
> hardware interrupt wakeup signals.
>
> Additionally, whether or not a device should wake-up the system is
> meant to be a policy decision based on sysfs (.../power/wakeup) in the
> first place.
>
> Update the driver to use the standard approach to enable/disable IRQ
> wake during the suspend/resume callbacks. This solves both issues
> described above.
>
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim_core.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim_core.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim_core.c
> index b5a5ed40faea9cfcceef5550263968148646eb44..ff3604be79da73ca5acff7b5b2434c116ed12ef8 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim_core.c
> @@ -421,21 +421,6 @@ static irqreturn_t max_tcpci_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> }
>
> -static int max_tcpci_init_alert(struct max_tcpci_chip *chip, struct i2c_client *client)
> -{
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(chip->dev, client->irq, max_tcpci_isr, max_tcpci_irq,
> - (IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT), dev_name(chip->dev),
> - chip);
> -
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> -
> - enable_irq_wake(client->irq);
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static int max_tcpci_start_toggling(struct tcpci *tcpci, struct tcpci_data *tdata,
> enum typec_cc_status cc)
> {
> @@ -532,7 +517,9 @@ static int max_tcpci_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> chip->port = tcpci_get_tcpm_port(chip->tcpci);
>
> - ret = max_tcpci_init_alert(chip, client);
> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev, client->irq, max_tcpci_isr, max_tcpci_irq,
> + (IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT), dev_name(chip->dev),
> + chip);
> if (ret < 0)
> return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret,
> "IRQ initialization failed\n");
> @@ -544,6 +531,32 @@ static int max_tcpci_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int max_tcpci_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (client->irq && device_may_wakeup(dev))
> + ret = disable_irq_wake(client->irq);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int max_tcpci_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (client->irq && device_may_wakeup(dev))
> + ret = enable_irq_wake(client->irq);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
> +
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(max_tcpci_pm_ops, max_tcpci_suspend, max_tcpci_resume);
> +
> static const struct i2c_device_id max_tcpci_id[] = {
> { "maxtcpc" },
> { }
> @@ -562,6 +575,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver max_tcpci_i2c_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "maxtcpc",
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(max_tcpci_of_match),
> + .pm = &max_tcpci_pm_ops,
> },
> .probe = max_tcpci_probe,
> .id_table = max_tcpci_id,
>
> --
> 2.50.0.727.gbf7dc18ff4-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists