[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PAXPR04MB845996327A0D0D85A1A93E8F8849A@PAXPR04MB8459.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 07:04:49 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Cristian Marussi
<cristian.marussi@....com>, "arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org"
<arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: convert to SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS
> Subject: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: convert to
> SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> The old SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() macro leads to a warning about
> an unused function:
>
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/scmi_power_control.c:363:12: error:
> 'scmi_system_power_resume' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-
> function]
> 363 | static int scmi_system_power_resume(struct device *dev)
>
> The proper way to do this these days is to use
> SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() and pm_sleep_ptr().
>
> Fixes: 9a0658d3991e ("firmware: arm_scmi: power_control: Ensure
> SCMI_SYSPOWER_IDLE is set early during resume")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Thanks for the fix. Nathan Chancellor posted a fix earlier, but
yours has pm_sleep_ptr which is better.
Acked-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists