[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <rd4bbz6jjohmeymqpbzaehgzqx2cooaelcryhbpaeyxkazwzjx@l4akvqxyv65t>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 10:55:32 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 56/80] pwm: img: Remove redundant
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls
On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 10:54:43AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(),
> pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call
> to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> The cover letter of the set can be found here
> <URL:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250704075225.3212486-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>.
>
> In brief, this patch depends on PM runtime patches adding marking the last
> busy timestamp in autosuspend related functions. The patches are here, on
> rc2:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \
> pm-runtime-6.17-rc1
My tree is based on v6.16-rc1 and this tag on -rc2. I merged it anyhow
and applied the pwm patch. We will see how much trouble this creates, I
hope very little.
Find the result on
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git pwm/for-next
.
Best regards
Uwe
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists