linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,lcc: Reference qcom,gcc.yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e3d93a4b-4009-47f7-909e-b58a33015858@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 12:08:07 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jeff Hugo <jeff.hugo@....qualcomm.com>,
 Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>
Cc: Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
 Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
 Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,lcc: Reference qcom,gcc.yaml

On 09/07/2025 11:37, Satya Priya Kakitapalli wrote:
> Reference the common qcom,gcc.yaml schema to unify the common
> parts of the binding.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,lcc.yaml | 17 +++--------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,lcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,lcc.yaml
> index 55985e562a34f8b1f5d8cff88fd733cdbae7d37c..b4b500dea527269a9a282b3f99714d5703dd9215 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,lcc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,lcc.yaml
> @@ -23,24 +23,11 @@ properties:
>    clock-names:
>      maxItems: 8
>  
> -  '#clock-cells':
> -    const: 1
> -
For the same reasons as further patch, no. You do not understand what is
happening here (and commit msg must explain such things)...

Best regards,
Krzysztof