[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250709104215.15562-4-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 16:12:03 +0530
From: neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paulmck@...nel.org,
joelagnelf@...dia.com,
frederic@...nel.org,
boqun.feng@...il.com,
urezki@...il.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
jiangshanlai@...il.com,
qiang.zhang1211@...il.com,
neeraj.iitr10@...il.com,
neeraj.upadhyay@....com,
"Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD)" <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 03/15] rcutorture: Make rcutorture_one_extend_check() account for hard IRQs
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
This commit retrospectively prepares for testing of RCU readers invoked
from hardware interrupt handlers (for example, HRTIMER_MODE_HARD hrtimer
handlers) in kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_CHK_RDR_STATE=y,
which is rarely used but sometimes extremely useful. This preparation
involves taking early exits if in_hardirq(), and, while we are in the
area, a very early exit if in_nmi().
This means that a number of insoftirq parameters are no longer needed,
but that is the subject of a later commit.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202505140917.8ee62cc6-lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Tested-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index a209d2419cfd..7944cc69321d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -1920,10 +1920,10 @@ static void rcutorture_one_extend_check(char *s, int curstate, int new, int old,
{
int mask;
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_CHK_RDR_STATE))
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_CHK_RDR_STATE) || in_nmi())
return;
- WARN_ONCE(!(curstate & RCUTORTURE_RDR_IRQ) && irqs_disabled(), ROEC_ARGS);
+ WARN_ONCE(!(curstate & RCUTORTURE_RDR_IRQ) && irqs_disabled() && !in_hardirq(), ROEC_ARGS);
WARN_ONCE((curstate & RCUTORTURE_RDR_IRQ) && !irqs_disabled(), ROEC_ARGS);
// If CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=n, further checks are unreliable.
@@ -1938,9 +1938,9 @@ static void rcutorture_one_extend_check(char *s, int curstate, int new, int old,
(curstate & (RCUTORTURE_RDR_RCU_1 | RCUTORTURE_RDR_RCU_2)) &&
cur_ops->readlock_nesting() == 0, ROEC_ARGS);
- // Timer handlers have all sorts of stuff disabled, so ignore
+ // Interrupt handlers have all sorts of stuff disabled, so ignore
// unintended disabling.
- if (insoftirq)
+ if (in_serving_softirq() || in_hardirq())
return;
WARN_ONCE(cur_ops->extendables &&
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists