[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025071044-bunt-sister-9d9e@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 15:09:20 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Heyne, Maximilian" <mheyne@...zon.de>
Cc: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"Sauerwein, David" <dssauerw@...zon.de>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 5.10] fs/proc: do_task_stat: use
__for_each_thread()
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 12:35:43PM +0000, Heyne, Maximilian wrote:
> From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 7904e53ed5a20fc678c01d5d1b07ec486425bb6a ]
>
> do/while_each_thread should be avoided when possible.
>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230909164501.GA11581@redhat.com
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Stable-dep-of: 7601df8031fd ("fs/proc: do_task_stat: use sig->stats_lock to gather the threads/children stats")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> [mheyne: adjusted context]
> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Heyne <mheyne@...zon.de>
> ---
>
> Compile-tested only.
> We're seeing soft lock-ups with 5.10.237 because of the backport of
> commit 4fe85bdaabd6 ("fs/proc: do_task_stat: use sig->stats_lock to
> gather the threads/children stats").
And this fixes it?
How?
>
> ---
> fs/proc/array.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
> index 8fba6d39e776..77b94c04e4af 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/array.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/array.c
> @@ -512,18 +512,18 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> cgtime = sig->cgtime;
>
> if (whole) {
> - struct task_struct *t = task;
> + struct task_struct *t;
>
> min_flt = sig->min_flt;
> maj_flt = sig->maj_flt;
> gtime = sig->gtime;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - do {
> + __for_each_thread(sig, t) {
> min_flt += t->min_flt;
> maj_flt += t->maj_flt;
> gtime += task_gtime(t);
> - } while_each_thread(task, t);
> + }
Ideally, the code generated here should be identical as before, so why
is this change needed?
confused,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists