linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add bindings for Variscite VAR-SOM-AM62P

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6656b2f0-5258-4f23-8988-567a7b598497@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 15:39:10 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Stefano Radaelli <stefano.radaelli21@...il.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
 Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add bindings for Variscite
 VAR-SOM-AM62P

On 10/07/2025 11:21, Stefano Radaelli wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Thank you for your suggestion. Actually, our compatible strings for
> Variscite SOMs follow the format "som-factor"-"processor". Here are
> some examples:

Then why do you define it reversed here? How this som-factor-processor
is an argument to my request to use som-factor-processor?

> 
> https://github.com/varigit/linux-imx/blob/lf-6.6.y_6.6.52-2.2.0_var01/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-var-som.dtsi#L14
> https://github.com/varigit/linux-imx/blob/lf-6.6.y_6.6.52-2.2.0_var01/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-var-som.dtsi#L15
> https://github.com/varigit/linux-imx/blob/lf-6.6.y_6.6.52-2.2.0_var01/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91-var-som.dtsi#L14
> 
> These strings are used in our Yocto filesystem for WiFi management and
> other applications. Changing them would require updating the entire

I did not ask about these. We talk here about this compatible.

I asked to reply with mailing list style already. Why are you still
top-posting? It makes the discussion difficult.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Best regards,
Krzysztof