[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250709194039.72202043@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 19:40:39 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: selftests: add PHY-loopback test
for bad TCP checksums
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 14:28:23 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> if (attr->tcp) {
> int l4len = skb->len - skb_transport_offset(skb);
>
> - thdr->check = ~tcp_v4_check(l4len, ihdr->saddr, ihdr->daddr, 0);
> - skb->csum_start = skb_transport_header(skb) - skb->head;
> - skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct tcphdr, check);
> + if (attr->bad_csum) {
> + __sum16 good_csum;
> + u16 bad_csum;
> +
> + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
> + thdr->check = 0;
> + skb->csum = skb_checksum(skb, skb_transport_offset(skb),
> + l4len, 0);
> + good_csum = csum_tcpudp_magic(ihdr->saddr, ihdr->daddr,
> + l4len, IPPROTO_TCP,
> + skb->csum);
> +
> + /* Flip the least-significant bit. This is fast,
> + * deterministic, and cannot accidentally turn the
> + * checksum back into a value the stack treats as valid
> + * (0 or 0xFFFF).
> + */
> + bad_csum = (__force u16)good_csum ^ 0x0001;
> + if (bad_csum == 0 || bad_csum == 0xFFFF) {
> + /* If the checksum is 0 or 0xFFFF, flip another
> + * bit to ensure it is not valid.
> + */
> + bad_csum ^= 0x0002;
> + }
> +
> + thdr->check = (__force __sum16)bad_csum;
> + } else {
> + skb->csum = 0;
> + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
> + thdr->check = ~tcp_v4_check(l4len, ihdr->saddr,
> + ihdr->daddr, 0);
> + skb->csum_start = skb_transport_header(skb) - skb->head;
> + skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct tcphdr, check);
> + }
> } else {
> + skb->csum = 0;
> + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
> udp4_hwcsum(skb, ihdr->saddr, ihdr->daddr);
> }
I think it'd be simpler if - after setting up CHECKSUM_PARTIAL
we called skb_checksum_help() to get the correct checksum filled in
and then did the bad checksum mangling.
BTW mangling like this should be idiomatic enough to avoid the comment:
thdr->check = thdr->check ^ 1 ?: CSUM_MANGLED_0;
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists