lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e2bbd34-e112-c15a-37ea-f97cbede910c@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 17:03:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
cc: agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org, song@...nel.org, yukuai3@...wei.com, 
    hch@....de, nilay@...ux.ibm.com, axboe@...nel.dk, cem@...nel.org, 
    dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
    linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, 
    ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com, 
    akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, djwong@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] dm-stripe: limit chunk_sectors to the stripe
 size



On Wed, 9 Jul 2025, John Garry wrote:

> Same as done for raid0, set chunk_sectors limit to appropriately set the
> atomic write size limit.
> 
> Setting chunk_sectors limit in this way overrides the stacked limit
> already calculated based on the bottom device limits. This is ok, as
> when any bios are sent to the bottom devices, the block layer will still
> respect the bottom device chunk_sectors.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@...ux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm-stripe.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-stripe.c b/drivers/md/dm-stripe.c
> index a7dc04bd55e5..5bbbdf8fc1bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-stripe.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-stripe.c
> @@ -458,6 +458,7 @@ static void stripe_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti,
>  	struct stripe_c *sc = ti->private;
>  	unsigned int chunk_size = sc->chunk_size << SECTOR_SHIFT;
>  
> +	limits->chunk_sectors = sc->chunk_size;
>  	limits->io_min = chunk_size;
>  	limits->io_opt = chunk_size * sc->stripes;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.43.5

Hi

This will conflict with the current dm code in linux-dm.git. Should I fix 
up the conflict and commit it through the linux-dm git?

Mikulas


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ