lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54d83775-7497-4fae-a9ea-bec8008557aa@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 16:18:32 +0100
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org,
        mpatocka@...hat.com, song@...nel.org, yukuai3@...wei.com, hch@....de,
        nilay@...ux.ibm.com, cem@...nel.org
Cc: dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        djwong@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] block: sanitize chunk_sectors for atomic write
 limits

On 10/07/2025 16:08, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> +	chunk_bytes = lim->chunk_sectors << SECTOR_SHIFT;
>> +	if (chunk_bytes) {
>> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->atomic_write_hw_unit_max >
>> +			chunk_bytes))
>> +			goto unsupported;
>> +	}
> Unnecessary indentation here. Why not just:
> 
> 	chunk_bytes = lim->chunk_sectors << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(chunk_bytes &&
> 			 lim->atomic_write_hw_unit_max > chunk_bytes))
> 		goto unsupposed.
> 
> Also avoids splitting a comparison over multiple lines, which is always
> annoying to read.

ok, I can tidy that up.

Thanks,
John

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ